ミメーシスとシンボル : カッシーラー哲学におけるその重要性

岩本, 智孝

doi:https://doi.org/10.18910/100354

ミメーシスとシンボル : カッシーラー哲学におけるその重要性

岩本, 智孝

メタフュシカ, 2024, 55, 13-24

アクセス数:128件（2026-02-15 23:21 集計）

固定URL: https://doi.org/10.18910/100354

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
mp_55_013	pdf	なし	1.42 MB	76	2025.02.19

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	ミメーシスとシンボル : カッシーラー哲学におけるその重要性
	Mimesis and Symbol : Their Importance in Cassirer’s Philosophy
	ミメーシス　ト　シンボル　カッシーラー　テツガク　ニ　オケル　ソノ　ジュウヨウセイ
著者	著者名岩本, 智孝 ; イワモト, トモタカ ; Iwamoto, Tomotaka
キーワード等	カッシーラー
	ミメーシス
	シンボル
	言語
	古代ギリシア
内容	論文
抄録	Cassirer (1874-1945) criticized copy theory [Abbildtheorie] in the Introduction and posed problems in Part I of The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923) to reinforce his symbolic philosophy. Copy theory undervalues the ability of signs because the latter cannot precisely represent their objects (cf. ECW 11, 41f). Cassirer accepted that symbolic signs omit the materials of their objects; however, he assumed that they acquired new expressive abilities, which are their distinguishing features. The copy, that is, the mimesis [μίμησις], has been discussed since ancient Greece. Plato explains that the true nature of art is mimesis, whereas poets only achieve superficial mimesis and cannot engage in genuine mimesis (cf. The Republic, Vol. 10). In The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Cassirer does not describe the person who advocates the copy theory that he refers to or criticizes. Therefore, we, as his readers, must trace his thought process. To reconstruct Cassirer’s outlook on copy theory, we must peruse not only The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms but also the records of his lectures, which reveal that Cassirer appreciated mimesis. In Cassirer’s symbolic system, mimesis is compared metaphorically to the “root” of a “tree.”
出版者	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
出版者	Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Osaka University
収録物名	メタフュシカ
収録物名	Metaphysica : the journal of philosophy and ethics
巻(号)	55
ページ	13-24
刊行年月	2024-12-25
言語	日本語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100354
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18910/100354
PISSN	13426508
NCID	AA11188127
アクセス権	open access
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
カテゴリ	メタフュシカ / No.55

資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	メタフュシカ. 2024, 55, p. 13-24
DC.title	ミメーシスとシンボル : カッシーラー哲学におけるその重要性
	Mimesis and Symbol : Their Importance in Cassirer’s Philosophy
	ミメーシス　ト　シンボル　カッシーラー　テツガク　ニ　オケル　ソノ　ジュウヨウセイ
DC.creator	岩本, 智孝
	イワモト, トモタカ
	Iwamoto, Tomotaka
DC.publisher	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
DC.publisher	Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Osaka University
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	日本語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2024-12-25
DC.subject	カッシーラー
	ミメーシス
	シンボル
	言語
	古代ギリシア
DC.description	論文
DCTERMS.abstract	Cassirer (1874-1945) criticized copy theory [Abbildtheorie] in the Introduction and posed problems in Part I of The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923) to reinforce his symbolic philosophy. Copy theory undervalues the ability of signs because the latter cannot precisely represent their objects (cf. ECW 11, 41f). Cassirer accepted that symbolic signs omit the materials of their objects; however, he assumed that they acquired new expressive abilities, which are their distinguishing features. The copy, that is, the mimesis [μίμησις], has been discussed since ancient Greece. Plato explains that the true nature of art is mimesis, whereas poets only achieve superficial mimesis and cannot engage in genuine mimesis (cf. The Republic, Vol. 10). In The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Cassirer does not describe the person who advocates the copy theory that he refers to or criticizes. Therefore, we, as his readers, must trace his thought process. To reconstruct Cassirer’s outlook on copy theory, we must peruse not only The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms but also the records of his lectures, which reveal that Cassirer appreciated mimesis. In Cassirer’s symbolic system, mimesis is compared metaphorically to the “root” of a “tree.”
DC.identifier	10.18910/100354
DC.format	100354
citation_title	ミメーシスとシンボル : カッシーラー哲学におけるその重要性
citation_author	岩本, 智孝
citation_publisher	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
citation_language	日本語
citation_date	2024-12-25
citation_journal_title	メタフュシカ
citation_volume	55
citation_firstpage	13
citation_lastpage	24
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100354
citation_doi_detail	10.18910/100354
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.18910/100354

ミメーシスとシンボル : カッシーラー哲学におけるその重要性

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示