「感覚的確信」の<真理>をめぐる「意識」の三つの態度と「弁証法」

大西, 健太

doi:https://doi.org/10.18910/100355

「感覚的確信」の<真理>をめぐる「意識」の三つの態度と「弁証法」

大西, 健太

メタフュシカ, 2024, 55, 25-36

アクセス数:84件（2026-02-13 18:48 集計）

固定URL: https://doi.org/10.18910/100355

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
mp_55_025	pdf	なし	1.31 MB	70	2025.02.19

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	「感覚的確信」の<真理>をめぐる「意識」の三つの態度と「弁証法」
	The three attitudes of Consciousness as Sense-Certainty and its dialectics
	カンカクテキ　カクシン　ノ　シンリ　ヲ　メグル　イシキ　ノ　ミッツ　ノ　タイド　ト　ベンショウホウ
著者	著者名大西, 健太 ; オオニシ, ケンタ ; Oonishi, Kenta
キーワード等	ヘーゲル
	精神現象学
	感覚的確信
	弁証法
内容	論文
抄録	I suggest an interpretation of the first chapter of Hegel’s “Phenomenology of Spirit” (1807). In this chapter, titled “Sense-Certainty”, consciousness (Bewußtsein) seeks to hold its “truth”. However, this “certainty” inevitably gets spoiled. It can be divided into three parts according to the attitudes consciousness takes. The truth becomes eventually “universal” in each part. Then, to make clear, I especially address the “dialectics” that Hegel applies to these situations. At first, I explain the truth here: this-such (Dieses), which has to point to its object as individual one. After that, I argued the constitutions of the three attitudes and “dialectics” for each part. To these constitutions, dialectic applied to the third attitude can and should be distinguished from the first because of its condition shown below. But this point is often overlooked. So, I put in effort to make it clear in the fourth section.
出版者	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
出版者	Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Osaka University
収録物名	メタフュシカ
収録物名	Metaphysica : the journal of philosophy and ethics
巻(号)	55
ページ	25-36
刊行年月	2024-12-25
言語	日本語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100355
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18910/100355
PISSN	13426508
NCID	AA11188127
アクセス権	open access
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
カテゴリ	メタフュシカ / No.55

資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	メタフュシカ. 2024, 55, p. 25-36
DC.title	「感覚的確信」の<真理>をめぐる「意識」の三つの態度と「弁証法」
	The three attitudes of Consciousness as Sense-Certainty and its dialectics
	カンカクテキ　カクシン　ノ　シンリ　ヲ　メグル　イシキ　ノ　ミッツ　ノ　タイド　ト　ベンショウホウ
DC.creator	大西, 健太
	オオニシ, ケンタ
	Oonishi, Kenta
DC.publisher	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
DC.publisher	Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Osaka University
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	日本語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2024-12-25
DC.subject	ヘーゲル
	精神現象学
	感覚的確信
	弁証法
DC.description	論文
DCTERMS.abstract	I suggest an interpretation of the first chapter of Hegel’s “Phenomenology of Spirit” (1807). In this chapter, titled “Sense-Certainty”, consciousness (Bewußtsein) seeks to hold its “truth”. However, this “certainty” inevitably gets spoiled. It can be divided into three parts according to the attitudes consciousness takes. The truth becomes eventually “universal” in each part. Then, to make clear, I especially address the “dialectics” that Hegel applies to these situations. At first, I explain the truth here: this-such (Dieses), which has to point to its object as individual one. After that, I argued the constitutions of the three attitudes and “dialectics” for each part. To these constitutions, dialectic applied to the third attitude can and should be distinguished from the first because of its condition shown below. But this point is often overlooked. So, I put in effort to make it clear in the fourth section.
DC.identifier	10.18910/100355
DC.format	100355
citation_title	「感覚的確信」の<真理>をめぐる「意識」の三つの態度と「弁証法」
citation_author	大西, 健太
citation_publisher	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
citation_language	日本語
citation_date	2024-12-25
citation_journal_title	メタフュシカ
citation_volume	55
citation_firstpage	25
citation_lastpage	36
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100355
citation_doi_detail	10.18910/100355
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.18910/100355

「感覚的確信」の<真理>をめぐる「意識」の三つの態度と「弁証法」

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示