Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus

Matsuhiro, Yutaka; Mizote, Isamu; Nakamura, Daisuke; Dohi, Tomoharu; Maeda, Koichi; Shimamura, Kazuo; Kawamura, Ai; Yamashita, Kizuku; Kosugi, Shumpei; Okuno, Shota; Sugae, Hiroki; Takeda, Yasuharu; Sakata, Yasushi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31415

Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus

Matsuhiro, Yutaka; Mizote, Isamu; Nakamura, Daisuke et al.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2025

アクセス数:1,711件（2025-07-18 14:45 集計）

固定URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100541

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
CatheterCardiovas_ccd.31415	pdf	なし	580 KB	50	2025.03.10

Creative Commons : 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus
著者	ORCID 0000-0002-5229-6857 0000-0002-5229-6857 著者名 Matsuhiro, Yutaka
	NRID 1000010584609 1000010584609 researchmap permalink mizoteisamu mizoteisamu Scopus Author ID 8266113500 8266113500 著者名 Mizote, Isamu
	NRID 1000030869970 1000030869970 researchmap permalink daifromn0525 daifromn0525 著者名 Nakamura, Daisuke
	NRID 1000090838137 1000090838137 researchmap permalink dohi_1230 dohi_1230 Scopus Author ID 35071263000 35071263000 著者名 Dohi, Tomoharu
	NRID 1000050644994 1000050644994 researchmap permalink koichi-maeda koichi-maeda Scopus Author ID 55318832600 55318832600 著者名 Maeda, Koichi
	NRID 1000010507205 1000010507205 researchmap permalink kazuo-shimamura kazuo-shimamura Scopus Author ID 35969640700 35969640700 著者名 Shimamura, Kazuo
	NRID 1000010838923 1000010838923 researchmap permalink a-kawamura a-kawamura Scopus Author ID 56414159900 56414159900 著者名 Kawamura, Ai
	NRID 1000060778661 1000060778661 researchmap permalink ky_osaka-u_2020 ky_osaka-u_2020 Scopus Author ID 57188740592 57188740592 著者名 Yamashita, Kizuku
	ORCID 0000-0002-0274-5052 0000-0002-0274-5052 著者名 Kosugi, Shumpei
	researchmap permalink okunoshota okunoshota 著者名 Okuno, Shota
	著者名 Sugae, Hiroki
	NRID 1000090572305 1000090572305 researchmap permalink takeda14 takeda14 Scopus Author ID 35398343900 35398343900 著者名 Takeda, Yasuharu
	NRID 1000000397671 1000000397671 ORCID 0000-0002-5618-4721 0000-0002-5618-4721 researchmap permalink C4589 C4589 Scopus Author ID 35395964700 35395964700 著者名 Sakata, Yasushi
キーワード等	bioprosthetic valve failure
	small aortic annulus
	structural valve deterioration
	transcatheter aortic valve replacement
内容	Matsuhiro Y., Mizote I., Nakamura D., et al. Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, (2025); https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31415.
抄録	Background: The long-term valve durability of supra-annular self-expanding valves (SEV) and intra-annular balloon-expandable valves (BEV) in patients with small aortic annuli remains unexplored. Aims: This study aimed to determine the long-term bioprosthetic valve durability with SEV versus BEV in patients with small aortic annuli. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and an aortic annulus area of 430 mm2 or less who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement using SEV and BEV between October 2009 and December 2022. Based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium's three definitions, the endpoints were hemodynamic structural valve deterioration (SVD) and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compare between the two groups and adjust for baseline characteristics. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model accounted for the competing risk of death. Results: In total, 565 patients (204 treated with SEV and 361 treated with BEV) were included. The median follow-up duration was 3.6 years [2.0 years, 5.7 years], and the maximum was 12.3 years. Hemodynamic SVD and BVF were less frequently identified in the SEV group than in the BEV group (1.1% vs. 9.1% within 5 years, 0.7% vs. 8.1% within 5 years, respectively). On the IPTW adjusted Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model analysis, hemodynamic SVD was less frequent in SEV compared with BEV (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.16; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.04–0.56, p = 0.004). SEV was also associated with a lower BVF risk than BEV (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08–0.76, p = 0.015). Conclusions: SEV appears to be more suitable for long-term valve durability in patients with a small aortic annulus.
出版者	John Wiley and Sons Inc
収録物名	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
刊行年月	2025-01-20
言語	英語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100541
PISSN	15221946
eISSN	1522726X
関連情報 (isIdenticalTo)	DOI (出版社版) https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31415
アクセス権	open access
権利情報	This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	学術雑誌論文 Journal Article

資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
ローカル資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2025
DC.title	Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus
DC.creator	Matsuhiro, Yutaka
	Mizote, Isamu
	Nakamura, Daisuke
	Dohi, Tomoharu
	Maeda, Koichi
	Shimamura, Kazuo
	Kawamura, Ai
	Yamashita, Kizuku
	Kosugi, Shumpei
	Okuno, Shota
	Sugae, Hiroki
	Takeda, Yasuharu
	Sakata, Yasushi
DC.publisher	John Wiley and Sons Inc
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	英語
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2025-01-20
DC.identifier	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31415
DC.subject	bioprosthetic valve failure
	small aortic annulus
	structural valve deterioration
	transcatheter aortic valve replacement
DC.description	Matsuhiro Y., Mizote I., Nakamura D., et al. Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, (2025); https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31415.
DCTERMS.abstract	Background: The long-term valve durability of supra-annular self-expanding valves (SEV) and intra-annular balloon-expandable valves (BEV) in patients with small aortic annuli remains unexplored. Aims: This study aimed to determine the long-term bioprosthetic valve durability with SEV versus BEV in patients with small aortic annuli. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and an aortic annulus area of 430 mm2 or less who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement using SEV and BEV between October 2009 and December 2022. Based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium's three definitions, the endpoints were hemodynamic structural valve deterioration (SVD) and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compare between the two groups and adjust for baseline characteristics. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model accounted for the competing risk of death. Results: In total, 565 patients (204 treated with SEV and 361 treated with BEV) were included. The median follow-up duration was 3.6 years [2.0 years, 5.7 years], and the maximum was 12.3 years. Hemodynamic SVD and BVF were less frequently identified in the SEV group than in the BEV group (1.1% vs. 9.1% within 5 years, 0.7% vs. 8.1% within 5 years, respectively). On the IPTW adjusted Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model analysis, hemodynamic SVD was less frequent in SEV compared with BEV (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.16; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.04–0.56, p = 0.004). SEV was also associated with a lower BVF risk than BEV (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08–0.76, p = 0.015). Conclusions: SEV appears to be more suitable for long-term valve durability in patients with a small aortic annulus.
DC.rights	This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
DC.format	100541
citation_title	Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus
citation_author	Matsuhiro, Yutaka
	Mizote, Isamu
	Nakamura, Daisuke
	Dohi, Tomoharu
	Maeda, Koichi
	Shimamura, Kazuo
	Kawamura, Ai
	Yamashita, Kizuku
	Kosugi, Shumpei
	Okuno, Shota
	Sugae, Hiroki
	Takeda, Yasuharu
	Sakata, Yasushi
citation_publisher	John Wiley and Sons Inc
citation_language	英語
citation_date	2025-01-20
citation_journal_title	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31415
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/100541

Long-Term Bioprosthetic Valve Durability After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With a Small Aortic Annulus

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示