ベルクソン　ケイジジョウガク　ヘ　ノ　ニュウモン　ケイジジョウガク　ニュウモン　ニ　オケル　ヤリナオシ　ノ　ロンリ

Introduction to “Bergson’s Metaphysics”　“The logic of retracing” in Introduction to Metaphysics

イソシマ, コウキ

Isoshima, Kouki

直観

やり直しの論理

直観的な科学

Bergson’s metaphysics

intuition

the logic of retracing

intuitive science

This paper aims to elucidate the essence of the “methodology grounded in metaphysics” as envisioned by Bergson in Introduction to Metaphysics. It highlights an inherent ambiguity in the methodological framework of “Bergson’s Metaphysics,” akin to a similar issue observed in “Kyosei Studies”. This ambiguity resides in Bergson’s contention that the two modes of knowledge—“analysis” and “intuition”—applied to the understanding of reality may also advance in a mutually complementary fashion.The challenges associated with this “Bergson’s Metaphysics” are addressed byexamining the three cognitive modalities tied to the interplay of intuition and analysis.The distinctive contribution of this paper lies in identifying a metaphysical definition of “the logic of retracing” within Bergson’s notion of “intuition” and elucidating the vision of an “intuitive science” where the complementarity of these two cognitive modes is fundamentally affirmed.