Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan

Goto, So; Mori, Yosai; Torii, Hidemasa; Hasegawa, Yumi; Kojima, Takashi; Kamiya, Kazutaka; Shiba, Takuya; Miyata, Kazunori

doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01217-z

Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan

Goto, So; Mori, Yosai; Torii, Hidemasa et al.

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2025

アクセス数:233件（2026-02-10 12:47 集計）

固定URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11094/102406

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
JpnJOphthalmol	pdf	なし	1.66 MB		2026.07.07

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan
著者	researchmap permalink gotoso gotoso Scopus Author ID 55319462800 55319462800 NRID 1000070972933 1000070972933 ORCID 0000-0003-4171-0781 0000-0003-4171-0781 著者名 Goto, So
	著者名 Mori, Yosai
	NRID 1000050445326 1000050445326 著者名 Torii, Hidemasa
	著者名 Hasegawa, Yumi
	著者名 Kojima, Takashi
	NRID 1000080439116 1000080439116 著者名 Kamiya, Kazutaka
	著者名 Shiba, Takuya
	著者名 Miyata, Kazunori
キーワード等	Cataract surgery
	IOL power calculation
	Japanese eye
	Post-myopic laser vision correction
内容	This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01217-z
抄録	Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of seven no-history intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in post-myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC) eyes in Japanese patients. Study design: Multicenter retrospective case series. Methods: This study included patients with previous M-LVC who underwent cataract surgery between 2016 and 2023. IOL power calculation formulas were assessed using measurements from a swept-source optical coherence biometer. Refractive prediction errors were calculated for the Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 (EVO 2.0), Post Myopic LASIK/PRK Hoffer QST (Hoffer QST), and Post-M-LVC PEARL-DGS (PEARL-DGS) formulas. These results were compared with those obtained from the Barrett True-K No History (BTKNH), Haigis-L, Shammas, and ASCRS average formulas. Heteroscedastic testing for root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) was used to evaluate formula performance. Results: The study comprised 125 post-LASIK eyes from 89 patients. Only the BTKNH had mean numerical errors not significantly different from zero. The formulas were ranked by absolute prediction error (MAE): ASCRS average (0.42 D), BTKNH (0.43 D), Hoffer QST (0.46 D), Pearl-DGS and Shammas (0.46 D), EVO 2.0 (0.48 D), and Haigis-L (0.51 D). The BTKNH and ASCRS average demonstrated smaller RMSAE compared to Shammas (P <.0001). The Hoffer QST had a smaller RMSAE than Pearl-DGS (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The BTKNH, ASCRS average, and Hoffer QST formulas are precise and reliable for improving postoperative refractive outcomes in Japanese patients with a history of M-LVC.
出版者	Springer
収録物名	Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
刊行年月	2025-07-07
言語	英語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/102406
PISSN	00215155
eISSN	16132246
関連情報 (isVersionOf)	DOI (出版社版) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01217-z
アクセス権	embargoed access
権利情報	© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2025.
権利情報	The full-text file will be made open to the public on 7 July 2026 in accordance with the publisher's policy.
出版タイプ	Accepted Manuscript
カテゴリ	学術雑誌論文 Journal Article

資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
ローカル資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025
DC.title	Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan
DC.creator	Goto, So
	Mori, Yosai
	Torii, Hidemasa
	Hasegawa, Yumi
	Kojima, Takashi
	Kamiya, Kazutaka
	Shiba, Takuya
	Miyata, Kazunori
DC.publisher	Springer
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	英語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2025-07-07
DC.identifier	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01217-z
DC.subject	Cataract surgery
	IOL power calculation
	Japanese eye
	Post-myopic laser vision correction
DC.description	This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01217-z
DCTERMS.abstract	Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of seven no-history intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in post-myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC) eyes in Japanese patients. Study design: Multicenter retrospective case series. Methods: This study included patients with previous M-LVC who underwent cataract surgery between 2016 and 2023. IOL power calculation formulas were assessed using measurements from a swept-source optical coherence biometer. Refractive prediction errors were calculated for the Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0 (EVO 2.0), Post Myopic LASIK/PRK Hoffer QST (Hoffer QST), and Post-M-LVC PEARL-DGS (PEARL-DGS) formulas. These results were compared with those obtained from the Barrett True-K No History (BTKNH), Haigis-L, Shammas, and ASCRS average formulas. Heteroscedastic testing for root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) was used to evaluate formula performance. Results: The study comprised 125 post-LASIK eyes from 89 patients. Only the BTKNH had mean numerical errors not significantly different from zero. The formulas were ranked by absolute prediction error (MAE): ASCRS average (0.42 D), BTKNH (0.43 D), Hoffer QST (0.46 D), Pearl-DGS and Shammas (0.46 D), EVO 2.0 (0.48 D), and Haigis-L (0.51 D). The BTKNH and ASCRS average demonstrated smaller RMSAE compared to Shammas (P <.0001). The Hoffer QST had a smaller RMSAE than Pearl-DGS (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The BTKNH, ASCRS average, and Hoffer QST formulas are precise and reliable for improving postoperative refractive outcomes in Japanese patients with a history of M-LVC.
DC.rights	© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2025.
DC.rights	The full-text file will be made open to the public on 7 July 2026 in accordance with the publisher's policy.
DC.format	102406
citation_title	Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan
citation_author	Goto, So
	Mori, Yosai
	Torii, Hidemasa
	Hasegawa, Yumi
	Kojima, Takashi
	Kamiya, Kazutaka
	Shiba, Takuya
	Miyata, Kazunori
citation_publisher	Springer
citation_language	英語
citation_date	2025-07-07
citation_journal_title	Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01217-z
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/102406

Accuracy of no-history formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in post-myopic laser vision correction eyes: a multicenter study in Japan

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示