Is logical analysis adaptable for art criticism? : A comparison between Russell and Fry

Kaname, Mariko

このアイテムのアクセス数:22件（2018-09-19 18:43 集計）

このアイテムへのリンクには次のURLをご利用ください:http://hdl.handle.net/11094/26817

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	サイズ	閲覧回数	説明
AESTHETICS_13_121	pdf	1.08 MB	39

論文情報

タイトル	Is logical analysis adaptable for art criticism? : A comparison between Russell and Fry
著者	Kaname, Mariko Kaname, Mariko
キーワード等	Roger Fry
	Bertrand Russell
	logical proposition
	perspective
	sensibility
抄録	In this paper, I have examined, through the criticism of Roger Fry, the analogy between painting and logic, including “colour” and “texture” which we cannot perceive by way of description. This type of speculation has not been explored completely by previous works, such as Ayer or Danto. Russell thought logical components contain not only a mathematical formula and language but even that of matter and space. His ideas enable us to deal with art-works as equivalents for logical proposition.The reason why Russell’s unoccupied perspective is useful to analyze art-works that appeared in modern art in the early 20th century is difficult to comprehend by the traditional way of thinking. Regarding the works of those such as Matisse and Cezanne, made without one-point perspective which represents an artist’s own perspectives, refuses any narrative interpretation: With how much accuracy does it represent the original object?; Who should we focus on in the picture plane? These paintings require the objective attitude that is necessary to deal with abstract shapes the same as representative figures. When we encounter the new pictorial space which does not resemble the real world, when we discuss the plastic relation of works, Russell’s theory of perspective is considered of value. However, it is necessary to employ Fry’s “aesthetic vision” and “sensual logic” in order to realize the subtleties of the colour and texture of art-works.
公開者	The Japanese Society for Aesthetics
公開者の別表記	美学会
公開者 (ヨミ)	ビガクカイ
掲載誌名	Aesthetics
巻	13
開始ページ	121
終了ページ	130
刊行年月	2009
ISSN	02890895
NCID	AA10423276
URL	http://hdl.handle.net/11094/26817
言語	英語

著者版フラグ	publisher
NII資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
ローカル資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
dcmi資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	Aesthetics.13 P.121-P.130
DC.title	Is logical analysis adaptable for art criticism? : A comparison between Russell and Fry
DC.creator	Kaname, Mariko
DC.publisher	The Japanese Society for Aesthetics
DC.language" scheme="DCTERMS.RFC1766	英語
DCTERMS.issued" scheme="DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2009
DC.identifier" scheme="DCTERMS.URI	http://hdl.handle.net/11094/26817
DC.subject	Roger Fry
	Bertrand Russell
	logical proposition
	perspective
	sensibility
DCTERMS.abstract	In this paper, I have examined, through the criticism of Roger Fry, the analogy between painting and logic, including “colour” and “texture” which we cannot perceive by way of description. This type of speculation has not been explored completely by previous works, such as Ayer or Danto. Russell thought logical components contain not only a mathematical formula and language but even that of matter and space. His ideas enable us to deal with art-works as equivalents for logical proposition.The reason why Russell’s unoccupied perspective is useful to analyze art-works that appeared in modern art in the early 20th century is difficult to comprehend by the traditional way of thinking. Regarding the works of those such as Matisse and Cezanne, made without one-point perspective which represents an artist’s own perspectives, refuses any narrative interpretation: With how much accuracy does it represent the original object?; Who should we focus on in the picture plane? These paintings require the objective attitude that is necessary to deal with abstract shapes the same as representative figures. When we encounter the new pictorial space which does not resemble the real world, when we discuss the plastic relation of works, Russell’s theory of perspective is considered of value. However, it is necessary to employ Fry’s “aesthetic vision” and “sensual logic” in order to realize the subtleties of the colour and texture of art-works.
citation_title	Is logical analysis adaptable for art criticism? : A comparison between Russell and Fry
citation_author	Kaname, Mariko
citation_publisher	The Japanese Society for Aesthetics
citation_language	英語
citation_date	2009
citation_journal_title	Aesthetics
citation_volume	13
citation_firstpage	121
citation_lastpage	130
citation_issn	02890895
citation_public_url	http://hdl.handle.net/11094/26817
citation_keywords	Roger Fry
	Bertrand Russell
	logical proposition
	perspective
	sensibility

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示