Made or Fabricated? Methods of Social Science and Understandings of Working Class Culture

North, Scott

doi:info:doi/10.18910/3543

このアイテムのアクセス数:114件（2018-12-20 00:13 集計）

このアイテムへのリンクには次のURLをご利用ください:https://doi.org/10.18910/3543

このアイテムへのリンクには次のURLをご利用ください:http://hdl.handle.net/11094/3543

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	サイズ	閲覧回数	説明
hs30-04	pdf	69.2 KB	160

論文情報

タイトル	Made or Fabricated? Methods of Social Science and Understandings of Working Class Culture
著者	North, Scott North, Scott
抄録	To explore differences and similarities in how history and sociology have each taken a “cultural turn” this paper compares the methods employed by a historian and a sociologist to study the emergence of working class cultures in Britain and Germany. Although they share the same subject matter, Richard Biernacki’s The Fabrication of Labor : Gernamy and Britain １６４０‐１９１４ and E. P. Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class, exhibit important differences in their approaches to the topic. These are manifest in the choices each made in the formulation of their research problems, the cases and data they selected, their units of analysis, and the key variables and conceptual constructs deployed. I account for these differences by looking to the extent to which concern for theory mediated the relationship between each writer and his subject, paying particular attention to methodological differences that arise out of each author’s scholarly passions, perceived place in the relations of knowledge production, and attachment to particular schools of thought.
公開者	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科
公開者の別表記	Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University
公開者 (ヨミ)	オオサカダイガクダイガクインニンゲンカガクケンキュウカ
掲載誌名	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科紀要
巻	30
開始ページ	48
終了ページ	61
刊行年月	2004-02
ISSN	13458574
NCID	AA11452371
URL	http://hdl.handle.net/11094/3543
言語	英語
DOI	info:doi/10.18910/3543

著者版フラグ	publisher
NII資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
dcmi資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科紀要.30 P.48-P.61
DC.title	Made or Fabricated? Methods of Social Science and Understandings of Working Class Culture
DC.creator	North, Scott
DC.publisher	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科
DC.language" scheme="DCTERMS.RFC1766	英語
DCTERMS.issued" scheme="DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2004-02
DC.identifier" scheme="DCTERMS.URI	http://hdl.handle.net/11094/3543
DCTERMS.abstract	To explore differences and similarities in how history and sociology have each taken a “cultural turn” this paper compares the methods employed by a historian and a sociologist to study the emergence of working class cultures in Britain and Germany. Although they share the same subject matter, Richard Biernacki’s The Fabrication of Labor : Gernamy and Britain １６４０‐１９１４ and E. P. Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class, exhibit important differences in their approaches to the topic. These are manifest in the choices each made in the formulation of their research problems, the cases and data they selected, their units of analysis, and the key variables and conceptual constructs deployed. I account for these differences by looking to the extent to which concern for theory mediated the relationship between each writer and his subject, paying particular attention to methodological differences that arise out of each author’s scholarly passions, perceived place in the relations of knowledge production, and attachment to particular schools of thought.
DC.identifier	info:doi/10.18910/3543
citation_title	Made or Fabricated? Methods of Social Science and Understandings of Working Class Culture
citation_author	North, Scott
citation_publisher	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科
citation_language	英語
citation_date	2004-02
citation_journal_title	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科紀要
citation_volume	30
citation_firstpage	48
citation_lastpage	61
citation_issn	13458574
citation_public_url	http://hdl.handle.net/11094/3543
citation_doi	info:doi/10.18910/3543

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示