ようこそ ゲスト さん
雑誌ブラウズ
雑誌 全て
大阪大学 刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
博士論文のみをさがす
このアイテムのアクセス数:
166
件
(
2021-01-25
11:14 集計
)
このアイテムへのリンクには次のURLをご利用ください:http://hdl.handle.net/11094/5663
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
jsn8_17
pdf
1.16 MB
251
論文情報
タイトル
東アジア圏の教育における大学間交流と質保証システム
別タイトル
Exchange between Colleges and Universities in the East Asian Higher Education Area and Quality Assurance System
タイトル (ヨミ)
ヒガシ アジアケン ノ キョウイク ニオケル ダイガクカン コウリュウ ト シツ ホショウ システム
著者
早田, 幸政
早田, 幸政
望月, 太郎
望月, 太郎
齊藤, 貴浩
齊藤, 貴浩
堀井, 祐介
堀井, 祐介
島本, 英樹
島本, 英樹
中村, 征樹
中村, 征樹
渡辺, 達雄
渡辺, 達雄
林, 透
林, 透
著者の別表記
Hayata, Yukimasa
Mochizuki, Taro
Saito, Takahiro
Horii, Yusuke
Shimamoto, Hideki
Nakamura, Masaki
Watanabe, Tatsuo
Hayashi, Toru
著者 (ヨミ)
ハヤタ, ユキマサ
モチヅキ, タロウ
サイトウ, タカヒロ
ホリイ, ユウスケ
シマモト, ヒデキ
ナカムラ, マサキ
ワタナベ, タツオ
ハヤシ, トオル
抄録
In the second Summit between Japan, China and South Korea, held in October 2009, the three countries agreed to facilitate the trilateral exchange between their colleges and universities and promote the infrastructural development of quality assurance in higher education. Hence, the CAMPUS Asia Pilot Program started and the cooperation toward the establishment of a transnational framework of quality assurance has been accelerated. Under the current situation, the Division of Higher Education Research and Development, Institute of Higher Education Research and Practice, Osaka University, in collaboration with the University of Kanazawa, the University of Chiba, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology and the Japan University Accreditation Association, conducted survey research on external/internal quality assurance systems of higher education in the above three countries plus Taiwan, as well as on the future common framework of quality assurance in higher education institutions in the East Asian area. According to the answers to the written inquiries sent in advance of our visit to Hangzhou University in China and National Yang Ming University in Taiwan, and the results of the interviews with the staff during on visits at Hangzhou University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the Shanghai Education Evaluation Institute in China, and Yonsei University and the Korea Institute for Higher Education Evaluation in South Korea, we conclude as follows: First, the importance of outcome assessment has been recognized and its methodology has been pursued and developed in each country. However, it is difficult for the colleges and universities to reach an agreement in terms of Cl'吋it exchange even at national level. For this reason, the development of common evaluation criteria and indicators based on global standards is important. Secondly, each university has to be autonomous so that it can develop an internal quality assurance system. In China, only major universities like Hangzhou University are given autonomy and are able to adjust external/internal quality assurance systems, while the other minor colleges and universities lack autonomy and are forced just to follow the external quality assurance standards set by the state. However, evaluating all colleges and universities by a single measure is problematic. Finally, the prospect of common framework of quality assurance in the East Asian higher education area seems dismaying because of institutional diversity of higher education system of the tree countries. Developing and sharing some common learning outcomes that can be used for institutional evaluation among the colleges and universities would be at the possible initial step towards the realization of the CAMPUS Asia Pilot Program.
公開者
大阪大学大学教育実践センター教育実践研究部
公開者 (ヨミ)
オオサカダイガク ダイガク キョウイク ジッセン センター キョウイク ジッセン ケンキュウブ
掲載誌名
大阪大学大学教育実践センター紀要
巻
8
開始ページ
17
終了ページ
39
刊行年月
2012-03-10
ISSN
18800130
NCID
AA12334290
URL
http://hdl.handle.net/11094/5663
言語
日本語
カテゴリ
紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
大阪大学大学教育実践センター紀要 / 第8号
論文詳細を表示
著者版フラグ
publisher
NII資源タイプ
紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ
紀要論文
dcmi資源タイプ
text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation
大阪大学大学教育実践センター紀要.8 P.17-P.39
DC.title
東アジア圏の教育における大学間交流と質保証システム
DCTERMS.alternative
Exchange between Colleges and Universities in the East Asian Higher Education Area and Quality Assurance System
DC.creator
早田, 幸政
望月, 太郎
齊藤, 貴浩
堀井, 祐介
島本, 英樹
中村, 征樹
渡辺, 達雄
林, 透
DC.creator
Hayata, Yukimasa
Mochizuki, Taro
Saito, Takahiro
Horii, Yusuke
Shimamoto, Hideki
Nakamura, Masaki
Watanabe, Tatsuo
Hayashi, Toru
DC.publisher
大阪大学大学教育実践センター教育実践研究部
DC.language" scheme="DCTERMS.RFC1766
日本語
DCTERMS.issued" scheme="DCTERMS.W3CDTF
2012-03-10
DC.identifier" scheme="DCTERMS.URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11094/5663
DCTERMS.abstract
In the second Summit between Japan, China and South Korea, held in October 2009, the three countries agreed to facilitate the trilateral exchange between their colleges and universities and promote the infrastructural development of quality assurance in higher education. Hence, the CAMPUS Asia Pilot Program started and the cooperation toward the establishment of a transnational framework of quality assurance has been accelerated. Under the current situation, the Division of Higher Education Research and Development, Institute of Higher Education Research and Practice, Osaka University, in collaboration with the University of Kanazawa, the University of Chiba, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology and the Japan University Accreditation Association, conducted survey research on external/internal quality assurance systems of higher education in the above three countries plus Taiwan, as well as on the future common framework of quality assurance in higher education institutions in the East Asian area. According to the answers to the written inquiries sent in advance of our visit to Hangzhou University in China and National Yang Ming University in Taiwan, and the results of the interviews with the staff during on visits at Hangzhou University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the Shanghai Education Evaluation Institute in China, and Yonsei University and the Korea Institute for Higher Education Evaluation in South Korea, we conclude as follows: First, the importance of outcome assessment has been recognized and its methodology has been pursued and developed in each country. However, it is difficult for the colleges and universities to reach an agreement in terms of Cl'吋it exchange even at national level. For this reason, the development of common evaluation criteria and indicators based on global standards is important. Secondly, each university has to be autonomous so that it can develop an internal quality assurance system. In China, only major universities like Hangzhou University are given autonomy and are able to adjust external/internal quality assurance systems, while the other minor colleges and universities lack autonomy and are forced just to follow the external quality assurance standards set by the state. However, evaluating all colleges and universities by a single measure is problematic. Finally, the prospect of common framework of quality assurance in the East Asian higher education area seems dismaying because of institutional diversity of higher education system of the tree countries. Developing and sharing some common learning outcomes that can be used for institutional evaluation among the colleges and universities would be at the possible initial step towards the realization of the CAMPUS Asia Pilot Program.
citation_title
東アジア圏の教育における大学間交流と質保証システム
citation_author
早田, 幸政
望月, 太郎
齊藤, 貴浩
堀井, 祐介
島本, 英樹
中村, 征樹
渡辺, 達雄
林, 透
citation_publisher
大阪大学大学教育実践センター教育実践研究部
citation_language
日本語
citation_date
2012-03-10
citation_journal_title
大阪大学大学教育実践センター紀要
citation_volume
8
citation_firstpage
17
citation_lastpage
39
citation_issn
18800130
citation_public_url
http://hdl.handle.net/11094/5663