Fieldwork : knowledge as the clinical

リンショウ ノ チ トシテノ フィールド ワーク ブンカ ジンルイガク ノ リアリズム ヲ サイコウ スル

タカハシ, イワネ

Takahashi, Iwane

オオサカ ダイガク ニンゲン カガクブ シャカイガク ニンゲンガク ジンルイガク ケンキュウシツ

英語

近代主義的枠組み

民族誌的リアリズム

倒錯的戦略

リアリズムの〈更新〉

knowledge as the clinical

the modernist framework of knowledge

ethnographic realism

the perverse strategy

'renewal' of realism

One of the problems which cultural anthropology hold at present is the question to (ethnographic realism). Recent arguments on this matter tend to completely deny it and replace it with another method, especially with the interpretive method. Though their attempts have began in the decade before, the denial of realism has not yet been thorough. Certainly, I agree with them in that it is impossible to maintain the so-called (ethnographic realism), but the right way is not the denying of realism itself but the renewing it in reference to at least the following two conditions. One of them is problem of locating ethnography in the modernist framework of knowledge which continues to remain in the social sciences concentrating on the macro-level analyses (that is, those except cultural anthropology), and the other is the "perverse strategy" (by Shigehiko Hasumi) which never denies realism but keeps questioning how it has come to generate.

英語