Experience and subject : the philosophy of Whitehead and Deleuze, the difference between them.

森, 元斎

doi:https://doi.org/10.18910/6397

Experience and subject : the philosophy of Whitehead and Deleuze, the difference between them.

森, 元斎

年報人間科学, 2011, 32, 111-118

アクセス数:271件（2025-04-24 03:06 集計）

固定URL: https://doi.org/10.18910/6397

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
ahs32_111	pdf	なし	436 KB	320	2012.09.22

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	Experience and subject : the philosophy of Whitehead and Deleuze, the difference between them.
著者	NRID 1000040846052 1000040846052 著者名森, 元斎 ; モリ, モトナオ ; Mori, Motonao
キーワード等	Experience
	Subject
	Whitehead
	Deleuze
	Prehension
抄録	It is one of current themes in the world to compare the philosophy of Whitehead with that of Deleuze in spite of their diverse aspects. When we read Deleuze's references to Whitehead, there are a lot of possibilities to understand them. Then, we want to describe any differences between Whitehead and Deleuze that are concerned with the concepts of experience, empiric and subject. We start with discussing experience and subject in Deleuse (1). Next, we approach the concepts of experience and subject in Whitehead concerning about Deleuze (2). Lastly, we will state the reason why Deleuze refuses the notion of Whitehead's prehension in Cinéma 1: L'image-mouvement of Deleuze (3).
出版者	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科社会学・人間学・人類学研究室
	オオサカダイガクダイガクインニンゲンカガクケンキュウカシャカイガクニンゲンガクジンルイガクケンキュウシツ
	Sociology, Anthropology and Philosophy, Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University
収録物名	年報人間科学
収録物名	Annals of human sciences
巻(号)	32
ページ	111-118
刊行年月	2011-03-31
言語	日本語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/6397
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18910/6397
PISSN	02865149
NCID	AN0020011X
アクセス権	open access
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
カテゴリ	年報人間科学 / 第32号

資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	年報人間科学. 2011, 32, p. 111-118
DC.title	Experience and subject : the philosophy of Whitehead and Deleuze, the difference between them.
DC.creator	森, 元斎
	モリ, モトナオ
	Mori, Motonao
DC.publisher	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科社会学・人間学・人類学研究室
	オオサカダイガクダイガクインニンゲンカガクケンキュウカシャカイガクニンゲンガクジンルイガクケンキュウシツ
	Sociology, Anthropology and Philosophy, Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	日本語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2011-03-31
DC.subject	Experience
	Subject
	Whitehead
	Deleuze
	Prehension
DCTERMS.abstract	It is one of current themes in the world to compare the philosophy of Whitehead with that of Deleuze in spite of their diverse aspects. When we read Deleuze's references to Whitehead, there are a lot of possibilities to understand them. Then, we want to describe any differences between Whitehead and Deleuze that are concerned with the concepts of experience, empiric and subject. We start with discussing experience and subject in Deleuse (1). Next, we approach the concepts of experience and subject in Whitehead concerning about Deleuze (2). Lastly, we will state the reason why Deleuze refuses the notion of Whitehead's prehension in Cinéma 1: L'image-mouvement of Deleuze (3).
DC.identifier	10.18910/6397
DC.format	6397
citation_title	Experience and subject : the philosophy of Whitehead and Deleuze, the difference between them.
citation_author	森, 元斎
citation_publisher	大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科社会学・人間学・人類学研究室
citation_language	日本語
citation_date	2011-03-31
citation_journal_title	年報人間科学
citation_volume	32
citation_firstpage	111
citation_lastpage	118
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/6397
citation_doi_detail	10.18910/6397
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.18910/6397

Experience and subject : the philosophy of Whitehead and Deleuze, the difference between them.

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示