The effects of deliberative and implemental mindsets on using of heuristics

ジュクリョ　ジッコウ　マインド　セット　ガ　ヒューリスティックス　ノ　シヨウ　ニ　オヨボス　エイキョウ

マツザキ, ケイスケ

Matsuzaki, Keisuke

沼崎, 誠

ヌマザキ, マコト

Numazaki, Makoto

オオサカ ダイガク ダイガクイン ニンゲン カガク ケンキュウカ タイジン シャカイ シンリガク ケンキュウシツ

実行マインドセット

係留と調整のヒューリスティック

人権プライミング

deliberative mindset

implemental mindset

anchor and adjustment heuristic

human-rights priming

This research examined whether deliberative-implemental mindset would affect the employment of heuristics in judgments. In the experiment, participants were randomly assigned to four conditions, standard mindset manipulation (deliberative vs. implemental; Gollwitzer, 1990) conditions, human-rights and stereotype questionnaire condition, and control condition. Results showed that participants who were in deliberative mindset manipulation condition and those who answered the series of questionnaires less employed ancho and adjustment heuristic to infer various topics than those in implemental mindset condition. These results suggested that the procedural priming could affect the employment of heuristics in judgments. And, these suggested that the series of answering to humanrights and stereotype questionnaire would be a manipulation of deliberative mindset.

沼崎, 誠