Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan

Kinoshita, Takahiro; Moriwaki, Kensuke; Hanaki, Nao; Kitamura, Tetsuhisa; Yamakawa, Kazuma; Fukuda, Takashi; Hunink, Myriam G.M.; Fujimi, Satoshi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x

Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan

Kinoshita, Takahiro; Moriwaki, Kensuke; Hanaki, Nao et al.

World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2021, 16, 2

アクセス数:535件（2025-10-23 23:30 集計）

固定URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11094/78363

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
WorldJEmergSurg_16_002	pdf	なし	1.09 MB	187	2021.02.02

Creative Commons : 表示

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan
著者	著者名 Kinoshita, Takahiro
	NRID 1000010514862 1000010514862 著者名 Moriwaki, Kensuke
	NRID 1000040817631 1000040817631 researchmap permalink kullervo1892 kullervo1892 著者名 Hanaki, Nao
	NRID 1000030639810 1000030639810 ORCID 0000-0003-0107-0580 0000-0003-0107-0580 researchmap permalink Kitamura_T Kitamura_T Scopus Author ID 22234282700 22234282700 著者名 Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
	NRID 1000050597507 1000050597507 著者名 Yamakawa, Kazuma
	NRID 1000040272421 1000040272421 著者名 Fukuda, Takashi
	著者名 Hunink, Myriam G.M.
	著者名 Fujimi, Satoshi
キーワード等	HERS
	ICER
	Markov model
	QALY
	Utility
内容	Kinoshita, T., Moriwaki, K., Hanaki, N. et al. Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan. World J Emerg Surg 16, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x
抄録	Background: Hybrid emergency room (ER) systems, consisting of an angiography-computed tomography (CT) machine in a trauma resuscitation room, are reported to be effective for reducing death from exsanguination in trauma patients. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a hybrid ER system in severe trauma patients without severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing the hybrid ER system to the conventional ER system from the perspective of the third-party healthcare payer in Japan. A short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model using a lifetime time horizon were constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and associated lifetime healthcare costs. Short-term mortality and healthcare costs were derived from medical records and claims data in a tertiary care hospital with a hybrid ER. Long-term mortality and utilities were extrapolated from the literature. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $47,619 per QALY gained and the discount rate was 2%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The hybrid ER system was associated with a gain of 1.03 QALYs and an increment of $33,591 lifetime costs compared to the conventional ER system, resulting in an ICER of $32,522 per QALY gained. The ICER was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold if the odds ratio of 28-day mortality was < 0.66. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the hybrid ER system was cost-effective with a 79.3% probability. Conclusion: The present study suggested that the hybrid ER system is a likely cost-effective strategy for treating severe trauma patients without severe TBI.
出版者	BioMed Central Ltd
収録物名	World Journal of Emergency Surgery
巻(号)	16
ページ	2
刊行年月	2021-01-07
言語	英語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/78363
eISSN	17497922
関連情報 (isIdenticalTo)	DOI (出版社版) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x
アクセス権	open access
権利情報	© 2021 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	学術雑誌論文 Journal Article

資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
ローカル資源タイプ	学術雑誌論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2021, 16, p. 2
DC.title	Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan
DC.creator	Kinoshita, Takahiro
	Moriwaki, Kensuke
	Hanaki, Nao
	Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
	Yamakawa, Kazuma
	Fukuda, Takashi
	Hunink, Myriam G.M.
	Fujimi, Satoshi
DC.publisher	BioMed Central Ltd
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	英語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2021-01-07
DC.identifier	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x
DC.subject	HERS
	ICER
	Markov model
	QALY
	Utility
DC.description	Kinoshita, T., Moriwaki, K., Hanaki, N. et al. Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan. World J Emerg Surg 16, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x
DCTERMS.abstract	Background: Hybrid emergency room (ER) systems, consisting of an angiography-computed tomography (CT) machine in a trauma resuscitation room, are reported to be effective for reducing death from exsanguination in trauma patients. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a hybrid ER system in severe trauma patients without severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing the hybrid ER system to the conventional ER system from the perspective of the third-party healthcare payer in Japan. A short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model using a lifetime time horizon were constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and associated lifetime healthcare costs. Short-term mortality and healthcare costs were derived from medical records and claims data in a tertiary care hospital with a hybrid ER. Long-term mortality and utilities were extrapolated from the literature. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $47,619 per QALY gained and the discount rate was 2%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The hybrid ER system was associated with a gain of 1.03 QALYs and an increment of $33,591 lifetime costs compared to the conventional ER system, resulting in an ICER of $32,522 per QALY gained. The ICER was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold if the odds ratio of 28-day mortality was < 0.66. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the hybrid ER system was cost-effective with a 79.3% probability. Conclusion: The present study suggested that the hybrid ER system is a likely cost-effective strategy for treating severe trauma patients without severe TBI.
DC.rights	© 2021 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DC.format	78363
citation_title	Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan
citation_author	Kinoshita, Takahiro
	Moriwaki, Kensuke
	Hanaki, Nao
	Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
	Yamakawa, Kazuma
	Fukuda, Takashi
	Hunink, Myriam G.M.
	Fujimi, Satoshi
citation_publisher	BioMed Central Ltd
citation_language	英語
citation_date	2021-01-07
citation_journal_title	World Journal of Emergency Surgery
citation_volume	16
citation_firstpage	2
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/78363

Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示