Meninjau Ulang Bahasa Jawa Pertengahan

Dwi, Puspitorini

doi:https://doi.org/10.18910/79357

Meninjau Ulang Bahasa Jawa Pertengahan

Dwi, Puspitorini

外国語教育のフロンティア, 2021, 4, 19-28

アクセス数:364件（2026-04-01 20:34 集計）

固定URL: https://doi.org/10.18910/79357

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
ffle_04_019	pdf	なし	687 KB	373	2021.04.16

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	Meninjau Ulang Bahasa Jawa Pertengahan
タイトル	Middle Javanese Language Revisited
著者	著者名 Dwi, Puspitorini ; ドゥイ, プスピトリニ
キーワード等	Middle Javanese
	Old Javanese
	Modern Javanese
	Language Variation
内容	論文
抄録	Linguistic evidence found in several texts produced during the Middle Javanese era has revealed that the language used in these texts was grammatically different from Old Javanese (OJ) but already showed grammatical characteristics of Modern Javanese (MJ). By revisiting these grammatical characteristics and confirming their appearance in Rajamudra inscriptions and Bismaprawa and Pramanaparwa—two texts from Merapi-Merbabu collection—this study aims to prove the existence of a new typology somewhere between OJ and MJ, which many have presumed to be Middle Javanese (MidJ). Bismaprawa, Pramanaparwa, and Rājamūdra inscriptions are purposely selected as the sources of data to offer a novelty in this research, considering that similar studies have never been conducted on these texts and inscriptions. The analysis shows that there is still no strong evidence to support the claim about a new typology of Middle Javanese. In Rājamūdra, only two grammatical characteristics of MidJ, as mentioned by Zoetmulder (1983) and Ogloblin (2008), are identified, which merely are formal variations. Any variation shown in MidJ basically just either proves or disproves the appearance of characteristics of OJ or MJ. This leads to a conclusion that MidJ is actually a variation of either OJ or MJ. The deviations of grammatical characteristics in these texts from those of OJ proves that there were linguistic variations of Old Javanese, that is, the language used by the scholars inside the palace and the daily language spoken by the commoners. This variation of OJ used outside the palace is what has been presumed to be MidJ. This study also shows a similarity in the sentential structure used in the three texts that were written in different places and periods. This similarity supports Ogloblin’s claim about the significance of considering register in determining variations of Javanese, instead of just relying on similarities or discrepancies based on periods of time.
出版者	大阪大学大学院言語文化研究科
	Graduate School of Language and Culture Osaka University
	オオサカダイガク　ダイガクイン　ゲンゴブンカ　ケンキュウカ
収録物名	外国語教育のフロンティア
収録物名	FRONTIER OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION
巻(号)	4
ページ	19-28
刊行年月	2021-03-30
言語	インドネシア語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/79357
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18910/79357
PISSN	24339636
NCID	AA12818923
アクセス権	open access
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
カテゴリ	外国語教育のフロンティア / 第4号

資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	外国語教育のフロンティア. 2021, 4, p. 19-28
DC.title	Meninjau Ulang Bahasa Jawa Pertengahan
DC.title	Middle Javanese Language Revisited
DC.creator	Dwi, Puspitorini
DC.creator	ドゥイ, プスピトリニ
DC.publisher	大阪大学大学院言語文化研究科
	Graduate School of Language and Culture Osaka University
	オオサカダイガク　ダイガクイン　ゲンゴブンカ　ケンキュウカ
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	インドネシア語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2021-03-30
DC.subject	Middle Javanese
	Old Javanese
	Modern Javanese
	Language Variation
DC.description	論文
DCTERMS.abstract	Linguistic evidence found in several texts produced during the Middle Javanese era has revealed that the language used in these texts was grammatically different from Old Javanese (OJ) but already showed grammatical characteristics of Modern Javanese (MJ). By revisiting these grammatical characteristics and confirming their appearance in Rajamudra inscriptions and Bismaprawa and Pramanaparwa—two texts from Merapi-Merbabu collection—this study aims to prove the existence of a new typology somewhere between OJ and MJ, which many have presumed to be Middle Javanese (MidJ). Bismaprawa, Pramanaparwa, and Rājamūdra inscriptions are purposely selected as the sources of data to offer a novelty in this research, considering that similar studies have never been conducted on these texts and inscriptions. The analysis shows that there is still no strong evidence to support the claim about a new typology of Middle Javanese. In Rājamūdra, only two grammatical characteristics of MidJ, as mentioned by Zoetmulder (1983) and Ogloblin (2008), are identified, which merely are formal variations. Any variation shown in MidJ basically just either proves or disproves the appearance of characteristics of OJ or MJ. This leads to a conclusion that MidJ is actually a variation of either OJ or MJ. The deviations of grammatical characteristics in these texts from those of OJ proves that there were linguistic variations of Old Javanese, that is, the language used by the scholars inside the palace and the daily language spoken by the commoners. This variation of OJ used outside the palace is what has been presumed to be MidJ. This study also shows a similarity in the sentential structure used in the three texts that were written in different places and periods. This similarity supports Ogloblin’s claim about the significance of considering register in determining variations of Javanese, instead of just relying on similarities or discrepancies based on periods of time.
DC.identifier	10.18910/79357
DC.format	79357
citation_title	Meninjau Ulang Bahasa Jawa Pertengahan
citation_author	Dwi, Puspitorini
citation_publisher	大阪大学大学院言語文化研究科
citation_language	インドネシア語
citation_date	2021-03-30
citation_journal_title	外国語教育のフロンティア
citation_volume	4
citation_firstpage	19
citation_lastpage	28
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/79357
citation_doi_detail	10.18910/79357
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.18910/79357

Meninjau Ulang Bahasa Jawa Pertengahan

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示