The influences of differences in expressive and expressed viewpoints on the answer tendency about experience of anger

ヒョウシュツシャ ト ヒヒョウシュツシャ ノ タチバ ガ イカリ ケイケン ニツイテノ カイトウ ケイコウ ニ オヨボス エイキョウ

アベ, シンゴ

Abe, Shingo

高木, 修

タカギ, オサム

Takagi, Osamu

オオサカ ダイガク ダイガクイン ニンゲン カガク ケンキュウカ タイジン シャカイ シンリガク ケンキュウシツ

自己正当化

視点の違い

被害者

加害者

anger expression

self-justification

perspective difference

victim

perpetrator

In this study, participants were asked to answer both experiences that they expressed anger to someone and someone expressed anger to them, and were examined whether differences in the answer tendencies of anger experience would be found between expressive and expressed positions. As a result, when answering about anger expressive experience, participants tended to answer that the damage by provocation was more serious and more continuous, the responsibility belonged to the expressed person was greater, the damage by anger expression was smaller and more justified, and the experience ended more negative result than when answering about an expressed experience. These results suggested that the motivational tendencies of self-justification exist in both viewpoints of an anger expressive person and an expressed person.

高木, 修