行為の記述をめぐるコンフリクトと、二人称性の問題

嘉目, 道人

doi:https://doi.org/10.18910/90206

行為の記述をめぐるコンフリクトと、二人称性の問題

嘉目, 道人

メタフュシカ, 2022, 53, 13-21

アクセス数:180件（2025-04-19 14:58 集計）

固定URL: https://doi.org/10.18910/90206

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
mp_53_013	pdf	なし	1.32 MB	255	2023.03.10

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	行為の記述をめぐるコンフリクトと、二人称性の問題
	Conflicts over the Description of Actions and the Problem of Second-personality
	コウイ　ノ　キジュツ　ヲ　メグル　コンフリクト　ト　ニニンショウ　セイ　ノ　モンダイ
著者	NRID 1000010761215 1000010761215 researchmap permalink michihito.yoshime michihito.yoshime Scopus Author ID 57193698072 57193698072 著者名嘉目, 道人 ; ヨシメ, ミチヒト ; Yoshime, Michihito
キーワード等	意図的行為
	実践的知識
	行為の記述
	二人称性
	コミュニケーション的行為
内容	論文
抄録	This paper offers some reflections from an ethics perspective on the perspectives in which the describer places himself/herself when describing what an intentional acts are in communication. The issues that are kept in mind are the following. Generally, a description of an intentional act by the actor himself is considered more valid than a description by others. However, if the act directly affects others, there may be a description of the act from the affected party, and that description will often be different from the description by the actor himself/herself. In such cases, it may not be sufficient to consider only the description from the actorʼs side, unlike the case where the act does not directly affect others. As a starting point for approaching this issue, this paper takes G. E. M. Anscombeʼs classical theory of acts. However, in approaching the ethical issues related to linguistic acts from there, we will mainly draw on Jürgen Habermasʼ theory of communicative acts and the ethics of debate. In particular, this paper focuses on the second-person perspective in which parties must place themselves when acts are described or redescribed in communication. This is the analogous to “I-thou” attitude of Martin Buber or the perspective that is in line with what Stephen Darwall calls the “second-person perspective”. In Anscombeʼs analysis of intentional acts, this perspective is not taken into account. Therefore, it would be of some significance to revisit this issue in light of the perspectives enumerated here.
出版者	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
出版者	Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Osaka University
収録物名	メタフュシカ
収録物名	Metaphysica : the journal of philosophy and ethics
巻(号)	53
ページ	13-21
刊行年月	2022-12-23
言語	日本語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/90206
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18910/90206
PISSN	13426508
NCID	AA11188127
アクセス権	open access
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
カテゴリ	メタフュシカ / No.53

資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	メタフュシカ. 2022, 53, p. 13-21
DC.title	行為の記述をめぐるコンフリクトと、二人称性の問題
	Conflicts over the Description of Actions and the Problem of Second-personality
	コウイ　ノ　キジュツ　ヲ　メグル　コンフリクト　ト　ニニンショウ　セイ　ノ　モンダイ
DC.creator	嘉目, 道人
	ヨシメ, ミチヒト
	Yoshime, Michihito
DC.publisher	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
DC.publisher	Department of Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Osaka University
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	日本語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2022-12-23
DC.subject	意図的行為
	実践的知識
	行為の記述
	二人称性
	コミュニケーション的行為
DC.description	論文
DCTERMS.abstract	This paper offers some reflections from an ethics perspective on the perspectives in which the describer places himself/herself when describing what an intentional acts are in communication. The issues that are kept in mind are the following. Generally, a description of an intentional act by the actor himself is considered more valid than a description by others. However, if the act directly affects others, there may be a description of the act from the affected party, and that description will often be different from the description by the actor himself/herself. In such cases, it may not be sufficient to consider only the description from the actorʼs side, unlike the case where the act does not directly affect others. As a starting point for approaching this issue, this paper takes G. E. M. Anscombeʼs classical theory of acts. However, in approaching the ethical issues related to linguistic acts from there, we will mainly draw on Jürgen Habermasʼ theory of communicative acts and the ethics of debate. In particular, this paper focuses on the second-person perspective in which parties must place themselves when acts are described or redescribed in communication. This is the analogous to “I-thou” attitude of Martin Buber or the perspective that is in line with what Stephen Darwall calls the “second-person perspective”. In Anscombeʼs analysis of intentional acts, this perspective is not taken into account. Therefore, it would be of some significance to revisit this issue in light of the perspectives enumerated here.
DC.identifier	10.18910/90206
DC.format	90206
citation_title	行為の記述をめぐるコンフリクトと、二人称性の問題
citation_author	嘉目, 道人
citation_publisher	大阪大学大学院人文学研究科哲学講座
citation_language	日本語
citation_date	2022-12-23
citation_journal_title	メタフュシカ
citation_volume	53
citation_firstpage	13
citation_lastpage	21
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/90206
citation_doi_detail	10.18910/90206
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.18910/90206

行為の記述をめぐるコンフリクトと、二人称性の問題

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示