欧州人権条約に基づく気候訴訟 : Urgenda財団対オランダ事件からの示唆

鳥谷部, 壌

doi:https://doi.org/10.18910/86850

欧州人権条約に基づく気候訴訟 : Urgenda財団対オランダ事件からの示唆

鳥谷部, 壌

国際公共政策研究, 2022, 26(2), 107-118

アクセス数:608件（2025-07-06 17:18 集計）

固定URL: https://doi.org/10.18910/86850

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	利用条件	サイズ	閲覧回数	利用開始日	説明	information
osipp_050_107	pdf	なし	1.27 MB	664	2022.03.24

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

タイトル	欧州人権条約に基づく気候訴訟 : Urgenda財団対オランダ事件からの示唆
	Climate Litigation under the European Convention on Human Rights : A Suggestion from the Urgenda Foundation v. the State of Netherlands Incident
	オウシュウ　ジンケン　ジョウヤク　ニ　モトヅク　キコウ　ソショウ　Urgenda　ザイダン　タイ　オランダ　ジケン　カラ　ノ　シサ
著者	NRID 1000040823802 1000040823802 著者名鳥谷部, 壌 ; トリヤベ, ジョウ ; Toriyabe, Jo
キーワード等	因果関係
	積極的義務
	部分的責任
	共通の基盤
	協力義務
	Causation
	Positive Obligations
	Partial Responsibility
	Common Ground
	Duty of Co-operation
内容	松本充郎准教授追悼特集
内容	In Honor of the Memory of Professor Mitsuo MATSUMOTO
抄録	Can Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights also apply to the global environmental problem of dangerous climate change? In December 2019, just before 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court held that the 2020 target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 20% compared to 1990 was too low. By confirming that time has passed without sufficient measures being taken, the Supreme Court has issued a stern warning that the 2030 target will not be allowed to follow the same old pattern. The judgment is suggestive in that the plaintiffs have identified a means to request a higher goal for the country's current greenhouse gas emission reduction targets under Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In short, according to this judgment, the country will be responsible for more than its own emissions in order to protect its people from dangerous climate change. What is the legal rationale for determining the responsibilities of such a country? This paper explores this question by focusing on causality. Not surprisingly, this judgment is binding only in the Netherlands, and it does not necessarily affect the climate proceedings currently pending in the ECtHR.
出版者	大阪大学国際公共政策学会
収録物名	国際公共政策研究
収録物名	International Public Policy Studies
巻(号)	26(2)
ページ	107-118
刊行年月	2022-03
言語	日本語
ハンドルURL	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/86850
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18910/86850
eISSN	24320870
NCID	AA1115271X
アクセス権	open access
出版タイプ	Version of Record
カテゴリ	紀要論文 Departmental Bulletin Paper
カテゴリ	国際公共政策研究 / 26巻2号(2022-03)

資源タイプ	紀要論文
ローカル資源タイプ	紀要論文
DCMI資源タイプ	text
DCTERMS.bibliographicCitation	国際公共政策研究. 2022, 26(2), p. 107-118
DC.title	欧州人権条約に基づく気候訴訟 : Urgenda財団対オランダ事件からの示唆
	Climate Litigation under the European Convention on Human Rights : A Suggestion from the Urgenda Foundation v. the State of Netherlands Incident
	オウシュウ　ジンケン　ジョウヤク　ニ　モトヅク　キコウ　ソショウ　Urgenda　ザイダン　タイ　オランダ　ジケン　カラ　ノ　シサ
DC.creator	鳥谷部, 壌
	トリヤベ, ジョウ
	Toriyabe, Jo
DC.publisher	大阪大学国際公共政策学会
DC.language' scheme='DCTERMS.RFC1766	日本語
DC.type' scheme='DCTERMS.DCMIType	text
DCTERMS.issued' scheme='DCTERMS.W3CDTF	2022-03
DC.subject	因果関係
	積極的義務
	部分的責任
	共通の基盤
	協力義務
	Causation
	Positive Obligations
	Partial Responsibility
	Common Ground
	Duty of Co-operation
DC.description	松本充郎准教授追悼特集
DC.description	In Honor of the Memory of Professor Mitsuo MATSUMOTO
DCTERMS.abstract	Can Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights also apply to the global environmental problem of dangerous climate change? In December 2019, just before 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court held that the 2020 target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 20% compared to 1990 was too low. By confirming that time has passed without sufficient measures being taken, the Supreme Court has issued a stern warning that the 2030 target will not be allowed to follow the same old pattern. The judgment is suggestive in that the plaintiffs have identified a means to request a higher goal for the country's current greenhouse gas emission reduction targets under Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In short, according to this judgment, the country will be responsible for more than its own emissions in order to protect its people from dangerous climate change. What is the legal rationale for determining the responsibilities of such a country? This paper explores this question by focusing on causality. Not surprisingly, this judgment is binding only in the Netherlands, and it does not necessarily affect the climate proceedings currently pending in the ECtHR.
DC.identifier	10.18910/86850
DC.format	86850
citation_title	欧州人権条約に基づく気候訴訟 : Urgenda財団対オランダ事件からの示唆
citation_author	鳥谷部, 壌
citation_publisher	大阪大学国際公共政策学会
citation_language	日本語
citation_date	2022-03
citation_journal_title	国際公共政策研究
citation_volume	26
citation_issue	2
citation_firstpage	107
citation_lastpage	118
citation_public_url	https://hdl.handle.net/11094/86850
citation_doi_detail	10.18910/86850
citation_doi	https://doi.org/10.18910/86850

欧州人権条約に基づく気候訴訟 : Urgenda財団対オランダ事件からの示唆

閲覧可能ファイル

論文情報

論文詳細を表示