Visual omitted stimulus potentials are not retinotopic

Ishida, Tomomi; Nittono, Hiroshi

Neuroscience Letters, 2024, 830, 137777

Number of Access:50（2025-10-17 01:48 Counts）

Identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11094/102321

Link to primary information 

File Format Terms of use Size Views Date.Available Description information
NeurosciLett_830_137777 pdf None 1.44 MB 26 2025.07.18  
Creative Commons : Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives

Item Information

Output File Export EndNote Basic Export Mendeley

Title
Visual omitted stimulus potentials are not retinotopic
Creator
ORCID
0009-0003-6589-3620 0009-0003-6589-3620
researchmap permalink
tomomiishida tomomiishida
Scopus Author ID
58686276300 58686276300
CreatorName
Ishida, Tomomi
NRID
1000020304371 1000020304371
ORCID
0000-0001-5671-609X 0000-0001-5671-609X
researchmap permalink
hiroshinittono hiroshinittono
Scopus Author ID
8131491700 8131491700
CreatorName
Nittono, Hiroshi
Subject
C1
Early visual cortex
Event-related potential
Omission
Prediction
Visual mismatch negativity
Description
Ishida T., Nittono H.. Visual omitted stimulus potentials are not retinotopic. Neuroscience Letters 830, 137777 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137777.
Abstract
Omitted stimulus potentials (OSPs) are elicited in response to the omission of expected stimuli and are thought to reflect prediction errors. If prediction errors are signaled in the sensory cortex, OSPs are expected to be generated in the sensory cortex. The present study investigated the involvement of the early visual cortex in the generation of OSPs by testing whether omitted visual stimuli elicit brain responses in a spatially specific manner. Checkerboard pattern stimuli were presented alternately in the upper and lower visual fields, and the stimuli were omitted in 10% of the trials. Event-related potentials were recorded from 33 participants. While a retinotopic C1 component was evoked by real visual stimuli, omitted stimuli did not produce any response reflecting retinotopy but did elicit a visual mismatch negativity, which was larger for omitted stimuli expected in the lower visual field than for those in the upper visual field. These results suggest that omitted visual stimuli are processed in a different pathway than actual stimuli.
Publisher
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Source Title
Neuroscience Letters
Volume (Issue)
830
Page
137777
Date of Issued
2024-05-01
Language
English
Handle URL
https://hdl.handle.net/11094/102321
PISSN
03043940
eISSN
18727972
Relation.isVersionOf
DOI (Publisher Version)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137777
Access Rights
open access
CopyRight
© 2024. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
oaire:version
Accepted Manuscript
Category
学術雑誌論文 Journal Article