What are the features of non-expert opinions on regenerative medicine? Opinion analysis of workshop participants

Nakagawa, Chie; Yagi, Ekou; Kato, Kazuto

Journal of Science Communication, 2011, 10(2), 1-11

Number of Access:648（2025-08-15 19:30 Counts）

Identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11094/24756

Link to primary information 

File Format Terms of use Size Views Date.Available Description information
jsc_10_2_1 pdf None 966 KB 6,038 2013.05.02  

Item Information

Output File Export EndNote Basic Export Mendeley

Title
What are the features of non-expert opinions on regenerative medicine? Opinion analysis of workshop participants
Creator
CreatorName
Nakagawa, Chie
NRID
1000030420425 1000030420425
researchmap permalink
ekouyagi ekouyagi
Scopus Author ID
16644346400 16644346400
CreatorName
Yagi, Ekou
NRID
1000010202011 1000010202011
ORCID
0000-0001-9006-9551 0000-0001-9006-9551
researchmap permalink
KatoOUMed KatoOUMed
Scopus Author ID
57349178000 57349178000
CreatorName
Kato, Kazuto
Abstract
Regenerative medicine (RM) has the potential to strongly impact on society. To determine non-experts’ impressions of RM, we analyzed opinions obtained from workshops in which participants freely discussed RM. Three major features were apparent. First, non-experts were most concerned with the possible effects of RM after it has been fully realized in society. Second, non-experts expressed concerns not only about RM itself, but also about the governance and operation of the technology. Third, non-experts were not only concerned about direct influences of RM, but also about its potential indirect influences. These identified features are likely to be controversial issues when RM is introduced into society. It is important to promote early discussion of these issues by society as a whole.
Publisher
SISSA Medialab
Source Title
Journal of Science Communication
Volume (Issue)
10(2)
Page
1-11
Date of Issued
2011-06
Language
English
Handle URL
https://hdl.handle.net/11094/24756
eISSN
18242049
Relation.isIdenticalTo
DOI (Publisher Version)
https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10020202
Access Rights
open access
oaire:version
Version of Record
Category
学術雑誌論文 Journal Article