Effects of sensory modality and task relevance on omitted stimulus potentials

Ishida, Tomomi; Nittono, Hiroshi

Experimental Brain Research, 2024, 242(1), 47-57

Number of Access:367（2025-10-17 01:48 Counts）

Identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11094/93748

Link to primary information 

File Format Terms of use Size Views Date.Available Description information
ExpBrainRes_242_1_47 pdf None 969 KB 132 2025.01.01  

Item Information

Output File Export EndNote Basic Export Mendeley

Title
Effects of sensory modality and task relevance on omitted stimulus potentials
Creator
ORCID
0009-0003-6589-3620 0009-0003-6589-3620
researchmap permalink
tomomiishida tomomiishida
Scopus Author ID
58686276300 58686276300
CreatorName
Ishida, Tomomi
NRID
1000020304371 1000020304371
ORCID
0000-0001-5671-609X 0000-0001-5671-609X
researchmap permalink
hiroshinittono hiroshinittono
Scopus Author ID
8131491700 8131491700
CreatorName
Nittono, Hiroshi
Subject
Event-related potential
Omission
Prediction
Self-generation
Sensory modality
Task relevance
Description
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06726-2.
Abstract
Omitted stimulus potentials (OSPs) occur when a sensory stimulus is unexpectedly omitted. They are thought to reflect predictions about upcoming sensory events. The present study examined how OSPs differ across the sensory modalities of predicted stimuli. Twenty-nine university students were asked to press a mouse button at a regular interval of 1–2 s, which was immediately followed by either a visual or auditory stimulus in different blocks. The stimuli were sometimes omitted (p = 0.2), to which event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. The results showed that stimulus omissions in both modalities elicited ERP waveforms consisting of three components, oN1, oN2, and oP3. The peak latencies of these components were shorter in the auditory modality than in the visual modality. The amplitudes of OSPs were larger when participants were told that the omission indicated their poor performance (i.e., they pressed a button at an irregular interval) than when it was irrelevant to their performance. These findings suggest that OSPs occur from around 100 ms in a modality-specific manner and increase in amplitude depending on the task relevance of stimulus omissions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Source Title
Experimental Brain Research
Volume (Issue)
242(1)
Page
47-57
Date of Issued
2024-01-01
Language
English
Handle URL
https://hdl.handle.net/11094/93748
PISSN
00144819
eISSN
14321106
Relation.isVersionOf
DOI (Publisher Version)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06726-2
Access Rights
open access
CopyRight
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
oaire:version
Accepted Manuscript
Category
学術雑誌論文 Journal Article